Reading Nucleic-Acid Backbones with a Loop-Holonomy Instrument How much does a molecule move when nothing is wrong — and what that number rules out
Preprint · not peer reviewed
Abstract
ABSTRACT
A protein or nucleic acid in solution is not a shape. It is a cloud of shapes — every model in an NMR ensemble is a legitimate fit to the same data, and the molecule really does occupy all of them at room temperature. We measured how wide that cloud is, on three substrates, and the number turns out to decide what any geometric measurement on those substrates is allowed to claim.
Across 1,172 protein molecules and 24,864 conformers, the frame defect angle moves 35.81° when nothing is wrong. The difference between a knotted protein and an unknotted one, on that same channel, is 3.3°. The feature is one eleventh of the cloud it sits in. Four separate experiments had already been run on that channel; all four were predictable failures, without labels, from a single unattended measurement that takes about a minute.
We report that floor and two more — 0.0640 for RNA |writhe|, 0.1886 for protein, ~0.18 for DNA duplex axes — and note that our registered expectation about which substrate would be noisiest was backwards. Alongside them: a matched positive control (the RydC RNA trefoil, reproduced on 4/4 seeds and confirmed by an independent tool, plus the new result that the knot survives all 24 plausible completions of its unmodelled gap, for a mechanistic reason); a DNA census of 250 curves returning zero knots; a citation trap that stops anyone following the literature; a gap artefact that injects 83 units of fabricated writhe at 460× the floor, large enough to invert a sign; two sign-inverting bugs in our own axis construction, both caught by a synthetic of known answer; a symmetry blind spot that is one line of algebra and the difference between AUC 0.98 and 0.51; and a factor-of-two error in our own linking-number code whose residual resolved to the Bishop frame’s own closure holonomy, agreeing with the
topological route to 1.8×10⁻¹³.
The instrument works. It works at a narrower thing than we hoped, and we can now say exactly how narrow, with a number.
Keywords: holonomy · parallel transport · geometric phase · Berry phase · Wilson loop · winding number · linking
number · Burgers vector · topological invariant · noise floor · loop walk · competence surface · nucleic acid topology ·
writhe · NMR ensemble
How to cite
Schulz, M. (2026). Reading Nucleic-Acid Backbones with a Loop-Holonomy Instrument How much does a molecule move when nothing is wrong — and what that number rules out. Preprint, Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21815319
Related papers
- Loop Walking: A Field Guide to Hacking the Universe with Holonomy5 August 2026
- The Tower Is Coordinate-Free: What Survives When You Change the Vertical Axis of a Prime Walk4 August 2026
- The Remote-Piloted Vessel: A Matriarch, Her Daughters, and the Ark They Were Built For4 August 2026
- The Anchor and the Hammer: Why No Observer Reads Itself True, and the Only Known Way Across the Wall20 July 2026
- Taking a Loop Walk Through the Integer Forest - A Coordinate-Free Holonomy Instrument for Multiplicative Structure20 July 2026
- Walking the Loop A Quick Guide to Holonomy — the plain-language primer20 July 2026
- Reading the Sky Through Loops Topological Loop-Holonomy as a Portable Instrument: Galactic Spiral Streaming and the Secular Aberration Drift, with a Mapped Competence Surface13 July 2026
- The Topological Tripwire: Detection by the Integer Noise Cannot Fake — a Verification Architecture, Validated Against Geodetic Ground Truth10 July 2026
- A Topological-Winding Memory Signed Multilevel Storage in Chiral Spin Textures, with Upgradeable Multimodal Readout, Intrinsic Radiation-Hardness, and Tamper-Response8 June 2026
- Comparative Biosonar & Navigation — A Method, Its Results, Its Corrections, and an Invitation2 June 2026
- The Red Queen's Prison: Frame-Lock and the Architecture of Organizational Collapse in Evolutionary Warfare2 June 2026